The Time Is Now! Removing Deception from Police Interrogation

— William Douglas Woody and Krista D. Forrest

We live in interesting times. Although both of us have long advocated for addressing the systematic racism in the criminal justice system (as well as in K-12 and higher education, healthcare, residential real estate markets, and elsewhere), this moment appears to present opportunities unlike any other time in our lives. As has been widely observed, the deaths of Michael Brown and Eric Garner (among many others) failed to lead to international marches for racial justice, and significant racial disparities remain across the criminal justice system, including in police stops, arrest-related deaths, and sentencing (e.g., Burch, 2011; Edwards et al., 2019; Pierson et al., 2020; Rhodes et al., 2015). This moment is also a time of intense scrutiny on police and supports for systemic reform (Cheney, 2020) with explicit goals of increasing public trust and faith in law enforcement (United States Congress, 2020). This moment in history appears unique as an opportunity for change, particularly for reforms that increase actual and perceived honesty of police in their dealings with the public. Why are we introducing interrogation reform into this conversation?

Despite extensive media attention on racial biases throughout the criminal justice system, the racial biases that pervade interrogation practices (similar to other areas of the criminal justice system) have received less scrutiny. People who identify as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) are overrepresented in exoneration databases and as false confessors for many reasons (Redlich et al., 2010; Villalobos & Davis, 2016). They are more likely to be targets of suspicion (Villalobos & Davis, 2016), and Taslitz (2006) argues that these cultural biases lead officers to employ more intense interrogation tactics against suspects who identify as BIPOC. This isn’t new. One only has to read Ibram X. Kendi’s Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America (2016) or James Loewen’s Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Book Got Wrong (2018) to understand that present systemic racism is one of the many contemporary consequences of historical racism. Additionally, suspects who identify as BIPOC, particularly Black men, know the cultural stereotypes about themselves and crime (Najdowski, 2011; Najdowski et al., 2015) and experience greater stress about how they present themselves during an interrogation. This stress makes them appear more guilty to police observers and may increase suspects’ suggestibility (see Gudjonsson, Claire & Rutter, 1995), which in turn increases the probability that they may falsely confess. Whereas false confessions raise questions about public trust and faith in the criminal justice system (Woody, Forrest & Stewart, 2011) across races for many people who identify as BIPOC, the criminal justice system appears as rigged as the typical carnival game. The big prize is just within reach, but they feel fortunate to escape without losing their lives (both figuratively and literally). Can police undertake interrogation reforms to increase transparency in the communities they police and rebuild this trust? Yes, they can. For guidance, we look to both history and science.

Police interrogation in what Kelling and Moore (1988) call the Political Era (pre-1930) typically involved coercion in many forms, including legal abuses such as holding suspects indefinitely without charge and physical abuses such as torture (see e.g., Larson, 1925; Leo, 1992; Woody, 2019). These abuses were exposed by government investigations (National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement, 1931; Chafee, Pollak & Stern, 1969), journalists (e.g., Hopkins, 1931), and courts (Brown v. Mississippi, 1936; Ziang Sung Wan v. United States, 1924). Although the impetus came from these forces and the accompanying public outcry, law enforcement personnel themselves reformed police interrogation to remove physical coercion from almost all police interrogation rooms by the early 1970s (Leo, 1992; Woody, 2019; cf. Ackerman, 2015 for ongoing concerns). Several individuals emerged as leaders in this process, including criminal justice administrators (e.g., J. Edgar Hoover, August Vollmer) as well as practitioners and trainers of police interrogation (e.g., Fred E. Inbau, John E. Reid) who provided a system that allowed officers to transition from physical coercion to deception and trickery as primary interrogation tools (Leo, 1992; Woody, 2019). Through these individuals and others, police themselves led the transition away from physical coercion to rebuild trust with the public and the courts. Unfortunately, as physical coercion waned its replacement, deception became the power tactic of choice.

However, the people remain powerful. Organizations such as the Innocence Project and persistent writers, producers, and lawmakers are now raising questions about police deception. For example, the documentaries Making a Murderer (Ricciardi & Demos, 2015), The Central Park Five (Burns, McMahon & Burns, 2013), and When They See Us (DuVernay, 2019) have raised substantial questions about police deception and its role in documented or alleged false confessions. Additionally, recent court decisions about deception during interrogation (see e.g., Bandler, 2014a, 2014b; People v. Aveni, 2014; People v. Thomas, 2014) have raised questions about increasing limits on police behaviors.

In addition to these historical precedents, we also draw support from recent scientific developments. Legal observers have recognized that police deception is nearly ubiquitous in interrogations that result in false confessions (Kassin et al., 2010). Additionally, a rapidly growing body of scholarship has provided experimental support for the claim that deception during interrogation, particularly deception about evidence, increases false confession rates (Kassin & Kiechel, 1996; Nash & Wade, 2009; Perillo & Kassin, 2010; Stewart, Woody & Pulos, 2018). In conjunction with this body of research, there is now a growing community of scholars who agree that deception about evidence increases false confession rates and report their willingness to testify about these findings at trial (Kassin et al., 2018). The now well-recognized impacts of police deception on false confession rates provide an important justification for this change, but there are others.

In addition to our foundational concerns about false confessions, we note other areas of risks here. As suggested by Skolnick and Leo (1992) and others (e.g., Gohara, 2006), enabling police to lie during interrogation may lead them to be more likely to lie in other contexts, such as in court, to superiors or internal affairs, or to journalists or the general public. Fundamentally, allowing police to lie to suspects in interrogation rooms threatens the public trust and faith in police. We join others (Kassin et al., 2010; Leo, 2008) in calling for the elimination of deception from police interrogation rooms. This would provide a critical tool to reduce false confessions and to address racial biases in interrogation strategies and false confession risks. The UK transitioned to nondeceptive and nonconfrontational methods in the 1990s without lowering confession rates (Gudjonsson, 2003; Milne & Bull, 1999). Similar strategies—successful interrogation strategies—are increasingly available to police officers in the US (Kolker, 2016). Not only would these changes reduce false confessions and increase the actual and perceived fairness and equity in the criminal justice system; these reforms would demonstrate to the wider public that police officers in the United States are committed to reform of racial biases and to increased transparency and trust of police in their communities. The time is now.


Ackerman, S. (2015, February 24). The disappeared: Chicago police detain Americans at abuse-laden ‘black site.’ Guardian. Retrieved from

Bandler, J. (2014a, October 15). Deskovic’s lie detector test was ‘an interrogation,’ expert testifies. Lohud. Retrieved from

Bandler, J. (2014b, October 24). Deskovic awarded $40M in wrongful conviction case. Lohud. Retrieved from

Brown et al. v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936).

Burch, A. M. (2011). Arrest-related deaths: 2003-2009 – statistical tables. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Burns, K., McMahon, D., & Burns, S. (Directors) & McMahon, D., Burns, K., & Burns, S. (Producers). (2013). The Central Park Five [Motion picture]. USA: Public Broadcasting Service.

Chafee, Z., Jr., Pollak, W. H., & Stern, C. S. (1969). The third degree: Report to the National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement. New York, NY: Arno Press & The New York Times.

Cheney, K. (2020, June 25). House passes sweeping police reform bill. Retrieved from

DuVernay, A. [Director.]. (2019). When they see us. USA: Netflix.

Edwards, F., Lee, H., & Esposito, M. (2019). Risk of being killed by police use-of-force in the U.S. by age, race/ethnicity, and sex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 16793-16798.

Gohara, M. S. (2006). A lie for a lie: False confessions and the case for reconsidering the legality of deceptive interrogation techniques. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 33, 791–842.

Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Gudjonsson, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., & Rutter, S. (1995). The relationship between suggestibility and anxiety among suspects detained at police stations.  Psychological Medicine, 25, 875-878.

Hopkins, E. J. (1931). Our lawless police: A study of the unlawful enforcement of the law. New York, NY: Viking Press.

Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A. & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 3–38.

Kassin, S. M. & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125–128.

Kassin, S. M., Redlich, A. D., Alcest, F., & Luke, T. J. (2018). On the general acceptance of confessions research: Opinions of the scientific community. American Psychologist, 73, 63–80.

Kelling, G. L., & Moore, M. H. (1988, November). The evolving strategy of police. (Perspectives on Policing, No. 4). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, and Harvard University.

Kendi, I. X. (2016). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. New York, NY: Bold Type Books.

Kolker, J. (2016). Nothing but the truth: A radical new interrogation technique is transforming the art of detective work: Shut up and let the suspect do the talking. The Marshall Project. Retrieved from

Larson, J. A. (1925). Present police and legal methods for the determination of the innocence or guilt of the suspect. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 16, 219-271.

Leo, R. A. (1992). From coercion to deception: The changing nature of police interrogation in America. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 18, 35–59.

Leo, R. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Loewen, J. W. (2018). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The New Press.

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Najdowski, C. J. (2011). Stereotype threat in criminal interrogations: Why innocent Black suspects are at risk for confessing falsely. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 562–591.

Najdowski, C. J., Bottoms, B. L., & Goff, P. A. (2015). Stereotype threat and racial differences in citizens’ experiences of police encounters. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 463–477.

Nash, R. A., & Wade, K. (2009). Innocent but proven guilty: Eliciting internalized false confessions using doctored-video evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 624–637.

National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement. (1931). Report on Lawlessness in Law Enforcement (Vol. 11). Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.

People v. Aveni, 6 N.E.3d 1124 (NY 2014).

People v. Thomas, 8 N.E.3d 308 (NY 2014)

Perillo, J. T., & Kassin, S. M. (2010). Inside interrogation: The lie, the bluff, and false confession. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 327–337.

Pierson, E., Simoiu, C., Overgoor, J., Corbett-Davies, S., Jenson, D., Shoemaker, A., Ramachandran, V., Barghouty, P., Phillips, C., Shroff, R., & Goel, S. (2020). A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 736-745.

Redlich, A. D., Summers, A., & Hoover, S. (2010). Self-reported false confessions and false guilty pleas among offenders with mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 79–90.

Rhodes, W., Kling, R., Luallen, J., & Dyous, C. (2015). Federal sentencing disparity: 2005-2012. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Ricciardi, L., & Demos, M. (Directors & Producers). (2015). Making a murderer. USA: Netflix.

Skolnick, J. H. & Leo, R. A. (1992). The ethics of deceptive interrogation. Criminal Justice Journal, 11, 3–12.

Stewart, J. M., Woody, W. D., & Pulos, S. (2018). The prevalence of false confessions in research studies: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 36, 12–31.

United States Congress. (2020). H.R.7100: George Floyd Law Enforcement Trust and Integrity Act of 2020. Retrieved from

Villalobos, J. G., & Davis, D. (2016). Interrogation and the minority suspect: Pathways to true and false confession. In M. K. Miller & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (Vol. 1, pp. 1–41). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Taslitz, A. E. (2006). Wrongly accused: Is race a factor in convicting the innocent?  Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 4, 121-134.

Woody, W. D. (2019). The History, Present, and Future of Police Deception during Interrogation. In T. Docan-Morgan (Ed.), Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication (pp. 727-746). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Woody, W. D., Forrest, K. D., & Stewart, J. M. (2011). False confessions: The role of police deception in interrogation and jurors’ perceptions of the techniques and their outcomes. In A. E. Hasselm (Ed.), Crime: Causes, Types and Victims (pp. 1–37). New York, NY: Nova Publishing.

Ziang Sung Wan v. United States, 266 U.S. 1 (1924).

William Douglas Woody is Professor of Psychological Sciences at University of Northern Colorado and the co-author of A History of Psychology: The Emergence of Science and Applications, Sixth Edition.

Krista D. Forrest is Professor of Psychology at University of Nebraska, Kearney, and has published articles in several core publications, including Psychology, Crime and Law and Behavioral Sciences and the Law.

You can read more about their new book Understanding Police Interrogation: Confessions and Consequences here.

Website | + posts